Legal Opinion

Carr v. Car-Perk Services, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 4, 1967No. 43013Published

1Opinion of the Court

Hall, Judge.

The defendant appeals from a judgment granting the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment in an action on a note, on the ground that the evidence submitted showed that the note sued upon was not a valid document and that the holder of the note never intended that the maker should pay it.

The defendant by stipulation admitted the execution of the note but in his answer denied that it evidenced an indebtedness for the purchase of property. He alleged that he did not receive any consideration for the note; that it was agreed by the parties that this was a dummy note executed solely *538fo…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  2. Draper v. MedlockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  3. Neal Loan & Banking Co. v. ChastainSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  4. Thompson v. ReeseCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  5. Car-Perk Services, Inc. v. CarrSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API