Tatum v. Mid-Century Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ELLIS, Justice.
Appellant, David Tatum (“Tatum”), sued his automobile insurance carrier, appellee, Mid-Century Insurance Company (“Mid-Century”), to recover damages arising from injuries sustained in a motor vehicle collision with an automobile driven by Karen Gilpin. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Mid-Century. After obtaining a severance of his cause of action from the original suit against Gilpin and Mid-Century, Tatum now appeals the order granting summary judgment in favor of Mid-Century. We affirm.
Tatum concedes in his sole point of error that there are no…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Archer v. GriffithTexas Supreme Court · 1964
- Armstrong v. Harris County, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1983
- Geisler v. Mid-Century Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Montanye v. Transamerica Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1982
- American General Fire & Casualty Co. v. OestreichCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Silver v. SlusherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Stracener v. United Services Automobile Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1989
- Pickens v. Texas Farm Bureau Insurance Companies, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1992
- Silver v. SlusherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989