Legal Opinion

Tatum v. Mid-Century Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 26, 1987No. B14-86-752-CVPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ELLIS, Justice.

Appellant, David Tatum (“Tatum”), sued his automobile insurance carrier, appellee, Mid-Century Insurance Company (“Mid-Century”), to recover damages arising from injuries sustained in a motor vehicle collision with an automobile driven by Karen Gilpin. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Mid-Century. After obtaining a severance of his cause of action from the original suit against Gilpin and Mid-Century, Tatum now appeals the order granting summary judgment in favor of Mid-Century. We affirm.

Tatum concedes in his sole point of error that there are no…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Archer v. GriffithTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Armstrong v. Harris County, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1983
  3. Geisler v. Mid-Century Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1986
  4. Montanye v. Transamerica Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1982
  5. American General Fire & Casualty Co. v. OestreichCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Silver v. SlusherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  2. Stracener v. United Services Automobile Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Pickens v. Texas Farm Bureau Insurance Companies, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1992
  4. Silver v. SlusherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API