Legal Opinion

Daschke v. Schellenberg

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1900PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Wayne; Frazer, J. Bill by Jobn Daschke and others against Harry L. Schellenberg and others to enforce a mechanic’s lien. From an order overruling a demurrer to the bill, defendants appeal: On motion to dismiss.

1Per curiam

A motion is made to dismiss an appeal from an order overruling a demurrer in chancery. Two grounds are urged:

1. That the order was not an appealable one.

2. That no bond was given.

The statute authorizes an appeal from an order overruling a general demurrer. 1 Comp. Laws 1897, § 549. The rule requiring a specification of cause in all demurrers does not abrogate or enlarge this statute. Appeals may still be taken from an order overruling a demurrer which prior to the rule might have been general. Greenley v. *17Hovey, 115 Mich. 504 (73 N. W. 808); Robinson v. Kunkleman, 117 Mich. 193 (75 N. W.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Robinson v. KunklemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Greenley v. HoveyMichigan Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kerr v. RuppMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Flynn v. HolmesMichigan Supreme Court · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API