Legal Opinion

In Re Utilities Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 27, 1919Published

1Opinion

The petitioner appeals from the ruling of the court denying the motion to dismiss made on the ground that the city of Charlotte had no such interest in the controversy as to justify and maintain its appeal, but we are of opinion that on the record and facts in evidence this position cannot be sustained. Not only was the city of Charlotte made a party and recognized as such by the Corporation Commission, but the Charlotte Street Railway Company, the predecessor in title of the petitioner, and under whose charter, so far as the record discloses, this appellant is now maintaining and operating…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Bryant v. HolladayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Muncie Natural Gas Co. v. City of MuncieIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Jones v. Wooten.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  4. Taylor v. ReadNew York Court of Chancery · 1834
  5. Corporation Commission v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API