Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Brown

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided September 23, 1994No. 93-0580; CMR No. 9101477Published

1ConcurrenceSullivan, Chief Judge

I concur with Judge Gierke’s opinion. In my view, appellant was prevented from putting on a critical part of his defense. See United States v. Rankins, 34 MJ 326, 331 (CMA 1992) (Sullivan, C.J., dissenting). Testimony that he was a religious, law-abiding man who abstained from using drugs and alcohol is relevant character evidence. Cf United States v. Thomas, 40 MJ 252 (CMA 1994).

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. RankinsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
  2. United States v. ThomasUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994