Legal Opinion

Commercial Casualty Insurance v. Mathews

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 10, 1938No. 26546PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSutton, J.

1. Where an accident policy insures “against the effects resulting directly and exclusively of all other causes from bodily injury sustained” during the life of the policy “solely through external, violent, and accidental means,” it is necessary, in an action thereon, to show that in the act which preceded the injury alleged to have been sustained by the plaintiff something unforeseen, unexpected, or unusual occurred. “The rule which seems to reconcile the cases involving a construction of this, or a similar clause, in an accident policy of insurance, is that when the facts show that no…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States Mutual Accident Ass'n v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Eastern District Piece Dye Works, Inc. v. Travelers InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  3. New York Life Insurance v. PattenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  4. Fulton v. Metropolitan Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  5. Wiley v. Rome InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Capone v. Aetna Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
  2. Wall v. Pennsylvania Life Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Thompson v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
  4. Turner v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Green v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1942

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API