Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Gusow v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 1, 2009No. 4D08-2135Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partHazouri, J.

I concur in the result because I agree that what sentence may be imposed upon violation of probation is a collateral consequence of the plea. However, see the contrary holding by the Third District Court in Polite v. State, 990 So.2d 1242 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008).

I disagree that Gusow’s claim is untimely if his claim of misadvice is a cognizable claim under rule 3.850. The majority relies heavily on the Florida Supreme Court’s decision in Ey v. State, 982 So.2d 618 (Fla.2008). In my judgment, the majority reads Ey too broadly. As the majority notes, the court in Ey concluded that a defendant must…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ey v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
  2. Polite v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API