Legal Opinion

United States v. John Buckendahl

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided May 31, 2001No. 00-1001, 00-1057, 00-1151 and 00-1266PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BEAM, Circuit Judge.

This opinion addresses appeals from five separate criminal cases in the Northern District of Iowa. At issue is whether a district court may depart downward from the United States Sentencing Guidelines (Guidelines) based on an interdistrict sentencing disparity arising from the practice of the United States Attorney for the Northern District of Iowa to rarely agree to grant use immunity under section 1B1.8 of the Guidelines. We hold that the court does not possess such authority. Accordingly, we affirm in part and reverse in part.

I. BACKGROUND

The defendant in each criminal…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Wayte v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. United States v. GoodwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Wade v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. John Herman Buckendahl, United States of America v. John Joseph Ringis, United States of America v. Joseph John Johnson, United States of America v. Juan Carlos Valdivia-Cardona, Also Known as Steven Paul Garcia, Also Known as Stevan Garcia, United States of America v. Jeffrey Alan ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API