Legal Opinion

Norton v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 14, 1937No. 14550PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Fishburne.

The plaintiff, a minor of sixteen years, brings this action by his guardian ad litem against the defendants, alleging slander. The trial of the case resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff, and it is now before us on one issue only, and that is, that the trial Court erred in refusing the defendants’ motion for a directed verdict which was made upon the ground that no actionable words were shown to have been uttered; that the words spoken by the manager of the defendant were words of plain and ordinary meaning, unambiguous, and did…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lily v. Belk's Department StoreSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
  2. Hubbard v. Furman UniversitySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
  3. Rowell v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1933
  4. Culler v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1937

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sandifer v. Electrolux Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949
  2. Brown v. National Home InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
  3. Appliance Buyers Credit Corp. v. BaxleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API