Legal Opinion

Arkoma Basin Exploration Company, Inc. v. Fmf Associates 1990-A, Ltd.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 2008No. 03-1066Published

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

════════════

No. 03-1066

════════════

Arkoma Basin Exploration Company, Inc., et al., Petitioners,

v.

FMF Associates 1990-A, Ltd., et al., Respondents

════════════════════════════════════════════════════

On Petition for Review from the

Court of Appeals for the fifth District of Texas

════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Argued December 1, 2005

2Concurring in part, dissenting in partJustice O’Neill

I agree that Arkoma’s reserve estimates cannot all be treated alike, as estimates for the relatively unexplored South Panola field were much more speculative. But the mere fact that…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Yuzefovsky v. St. John's Wood ApartmentsSupreme Court of Virginia · 2001
  2. Horner v. AhernSupreme Court of Virginia · 1967
  3. Arkoma Basin Exploration Co. v. FMF Associates 1990-A, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API