Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Brown v. Monticello State Bank of Monticello

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 16, 1988No. 86-669Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partHarris, Justice

I concur in the majority opinion affirming on the appeal but would reverse on the cross appeal. After the conservatorship was opened cattle which had belonged to Brady were sold and the proceeds were deposited in the conservatorship account.. Eventually the proceeds became the property of the plaintiffs.

Ralph Brown’s claim to the cattle was based on a bill of sale from Brady. Although the jury was entitled to find it valid, I cannot believe under the circumstances here the bank should be held liable for converting the cattle. Thomas B. Brown, the other plaintiff, testified as follows:

Q. He…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re Laufert's GuardianshipSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API