Legal Opinion

Dolan v. Supreme Council Catholic Mutual Benefit Ass'n

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1907No. Docket No. 39PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error to Wayne; Donovan, J. Assumpsit by Rose Dolan against the Supreme Council of the Catholic Mutual Benefit Association on a policy of insurance. There was judgment for defendant on a verdict directed by the court, and plaintiff brings error. Defendant is a mutual benefit association organized under the laws of the State of New York. On the 24th of March, 1884, it insured the life of James Dolan, one of its members.

Read the full summary

Error to Wayne; Donovan, J. Assumpsit by Rose Dolan against the Supreme Council of the Catholic Mutual Benefit Association on a policy of insurance. There was judgment for defendant on a verdict directed by the court, and plaintiff brings error. Defendant is a mutual benefit association organized under the laws of the State of New York. On the 24th of March, 1884, it insured the life of James Dolan, one of its members. The certificate or policy of insurance named Anna Dolan, the wife of the insured, beneficiary. Anna Dolan having died, the insured on the 13th of March, 1900, took out a new…

1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, J.

(after stating the facts). First. Had the insured a lawful right to designate Guerold as beneficiary ? Plaintiff contends that he had not; that he was prohibited from doing this upon grounds of public policy. If the contract in question were a New York contract, and its lawfulness determined by the law of that State, we should be forced to deny this contention, for the courts of that State, as heretofore stated, have determined this question adversely to plaintiff. The contract in question, however, is — and this is now conceded by defendant’s counsel — a Michigan contract. Its lawfulness is…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Warnock v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Union Fraternal League v. WaltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  3. Carmichael v. Northwestern Mutual Benefit Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Hess' Admr. v. SegenfelterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
  5. Scott v. DicksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1885

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. New York Life Ins. v. MurtaghSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
  2. Gristy v. HudgensArizona Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Bristol v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Christenson v. MadsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  5. De Graw v. Supreme Court, I. O. F.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API