Legal Opinion

United States v. Russell

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 6, 1955PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEINFELD, District Judge.

Petitioner, William Upshaw, moves for a writ of error coram nobis to set aside and vacate a judgment of conviction entered on April 2, 1931, upon his plea of guilty to the sale of narcotics. The basis of his motion is that he was not represented by counsel at the time of the pleading or sentence which was imposed immediately thereafter and that he did not intelligently waive his right to the assistance of counsel.

Upshaw is presently confined at Dannemora, a New York State prison, as a multiple offender. Originally he appeared in person but the Court appointed counsel…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. Dyer v. MacDougallCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
  5. Hawk v. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. MarcelloDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1962
  2. United States v. RussellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
  3. United States v. Jimmie RussellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API