Legal Opinion

Colombo v. Johns-Manville Corp.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 19, 1984No. Civ. A. 82-0685PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LOUIS H. POLLAK, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff George Colombo alleges that, while an employee of the United States at the Philadelphia Naval Shipyard, he was exposed to asbestos-containing products manufactured or distributed by defendants, and that this exposure caused a number of severe injuries. Mr. Colombo alleges that he may have suffered some of his exposure to asbestos particles while working on vessels owned by the United States. Defendant Pittsburgh-Corning’s third-party complaint seeks indemnity or contribution from the United States for any damages that plaintiff…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Richards v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Executive Jet Aviation, Inc. v. City of ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Scindia Steam Navigation Co. v. De Los SantosSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. United States v. SpearinSupreme Court of the United States · 1918

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. LaBarge v. County of MariposaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  2. In Re ALL MAINE ASBESTOS LITIGATION (PNS CASES). Petition of UNITED STATES of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
  3. Wallace v. Ryan-Walsh Stevedoring Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1989
  4. Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  5. Lopez v. Johns ManvilleDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API