Ward v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1DissentSognier, Judge
I respectfully dissent. Whether statements fall within the res gestae exception to the hearsay rule is within the discretion of the trial court; however, this does not mean that such discretion is not subject to appellate review. The standard for review set forth by our Supreme Court is that “a trial judge’s determination that evidence offered as part of the res gestae is sufficiently informative and reliable as to warrant being considered by the jury will not be disturbed on appeal unless that determination is clearly erroneous.” Andrews v. State, 249 Ga. 223, 228 (290 SE2d 71) (1982). In my…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Allison v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
- Andrews v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
- State v. ButlerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
- Almond v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.