Legal Opinion
The Canary No. 2
United States Circuit Court
Decided June 15, 1884PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Admiralty Appeal.
1Opinion of the Court
Paiidee, J,
The case made establishes the libelant’s lion for advances, supplies, and labor under the laws of Louisiana for $634.32, upon the Canary No. 2, which is properly enforceable here, provided (1) the law of Louisiana gives a lien for advances of money to the captain and owners to pay the general running expenses of the ship; and (2) that the Hen has not been lost by the hona fide sale of the ship in port, and a voyage made in the name and at the risk of the purchaser without any claim interposed. The lien under the laws of Louisiana for moneys advanced to pay the running expenses of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- The "Edith."Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Grant v. FiolSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1841
- Owens v. DavisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1860
- Agricultural Bank of Mississippi v. JaneSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1841
- Hill v. Phœnix Tow Boat Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1842
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Union Switch & Signal Co. v. Johnson Railroad Signal Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1894
- Regina v. Dunlop S. S. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1904