P. S. Whiteleather v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Per curiam
The Government filed two actions in the District Court against the appellant under the provisions of the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938, as amended and supplemented, to collect penalties for over acreage planting of wheat. Sections 1281-1393, Title 7 U.S. C.A.
The closing prayers in the complaints read, “Wherefore, plaintiff demands judgment against defendant for the sum of $(Amount here inserted); the costs of this action, and such other relief as this Court may deem just and proper in the premises.” Summary judgment against the appellant was rendered in each action. The judgments read,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ackermann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Morris v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Manson v. DuncansonSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Ginsberg v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
3Cited by9 opinions
- Harriet H. Hoffman, of the Estate of Ivan M. Hoffman v. Anthony Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
- Kowall v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1971
- Lazare Kaplan International, Inc. v. Photoscribe Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- United States v. ManosDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1972
- Joseph F. Hughes & Company, Inc. v. United Plumbing & Heating, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.