Legal Opinion

Strickland v. Graybill

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided November 16, 1899PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of Botetourt county, rendered May 26, 1898, in an action of debt, wherein the plaintiff in error was the plaintiff, and the defendants in error were the defendants.

1Opinion of the Court

Keith, P.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

Jonas Graybill, with J. H. Graybill as his endorser, executed two notes to Strickland for the price of a certain patent, which notes were from time to time renewed, and, the notes last given not having' been paid, suit was brought to recover the money represented by them. The defendants appeared and pleaded the general issue, and a special plea, in which they aver that the notes sued on were given for the purchase price of a certain patent right for a bed brace for the States of Ohio and Alabama; that the defendants were induced to purchase by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Max Meadows Land & Improvement Co. v. BradySupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
  2. Watkins v. West Wytheville Land & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1895
  3. Tyson v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1899
  4. Shiflett v. Orange Humane SocietySupreme Court of Virginia · 1851

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. McBee v. DeusenberryWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Kabatchnick v. Hanover-Elm Building Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
  3. Caples v. MorganOregon Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Cerriglio v. PettitSupreme Court of Virginia · 1912
  5. Payne v. BeaumontCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API