Legal Opinion

Maikka v. Salo

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 15, 1943No. 14,944PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bakke

This is a will contest. Testatrix was Hilma Maikka who left all of her estate — except one dollar to each of two sons — to her daughter, Sophia Salo, defendant in error, who also was the proponent of the will, and who is designated by counsel as contestee. When the will was offered for probate, caveat was filed by proponent’s brothers, Fred R. Maikka and Erik W. Maikka. In the original and amended caveats, mental incapacity (in the original caveat only), fraud, and undue influence by the daughter were urged, but these charges were abandoned and lack of proper execution became the sole issue.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of ShapterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1906
  2. Norris v. BradshawSupreme Court of Colorado · 1932
  3. White v. BowerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1913
  4. Aquilini v. ChamblinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1934
  5. Welsh v. NoyesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lake Meredith Reservoir Co. v. Amity Mutual Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  2. Johansen v. SchuettigSupreme Court of Colorado · 1948
  3. Matter of Estate of MussoColorado Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Higby v. HigbyColorado Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Scott v. LeonardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API