Crowell v. Gilmore
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the ¡Ninth District. The facts appear in the opinion, and in 13 Cal. 54.
1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.
Field, C. J. and Cope, J. concurring.
Bill filed to enforce a mechanic’s lien.
Crowell, the plaintiff, and Scranton, Drummond and Demarest, interveners, were employed by defendants, Bull & Spencer, to work on a building in Shasta, in October, 1856, and they continued to *371work until April, 1857. On the fifteenth of ¡November, 1856, Bull & Spencer, the owners, mortgaged the building to defendant Shea. After this date, the appellants, Yan Schank, Beckhard, Iieely and Hughson, were employed as mechanics on the building, and continued to work until the first of April, 1857. In April, 1857, Bull…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Crowell v. GilmoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
3Cited by13 opinions
- Farmers Loan & Trust Co. v. Canada & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Henry & Coatsworth Co. v. FisherdickNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
- Ward v. YarnelleIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
- Finlayson v. CrooksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Gardner v. LeckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.