Legal Opinion

Duncan v. Bigelow

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided April 4, 1950No. 3913PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnston, C. J.

A preliminary question arises concerning the right of the administrator to have the will construed. It was held in Podrasnik v. Trust Company, 92 N. H. 65, that the sole procedure for an executrix who desired a will construed for purposes of distribution was “to file an account of her settlement of the estate accompanied with a petition for a decree of distribution of the balance found in her hands upon the settlement.”

It is true that whether a court of equity will advise or direct is a matter of discretion. 33 C. J. S. 1109. In the present case the Superior Court has exercised its discretion…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wilmerton v. WilmertonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1910

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re Bierstedt's EstateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
  2. Estate of MasonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Forbes v. BurketDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  4. Estate of EhrenfelsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. Crocker-Citizens National Bank v. CrockettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API