Legal Opinion

Stock v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 19, 2007Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge FRIEDMAN.

Paul E. Stock (Claimant) petitions for review of the June 12, 2007, order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (WCAB) affirming the decision of a workers’ compensation judge (WCJ) to dismiss Claimant’s petition to review compensation benefits (Review Petition) as untimely under section 413(a) of the Workers’ Compensation Act (Act). 1 We also affirm.

On August 6, 1985, Claimant sustained a work-related neck injury and began receiving temporary total disability benefits pursuant to a notice of compensation payable (NCP) issued by Food Chek Shopping Bag (Employer)…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Westinghouse Electric Corp./CBS v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Indiana Floral Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Lopresti v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Sena v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API