Legal Opinion

Coonan v. Baltimore & Ohio R. R.

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas

Decided December 27, 1938Published

1Opinion of the Court

Kalodner, J.,

This is a motion for a new trial, following a verdict for defendant, in a suit by plaintiff to recover damages resulting to plaintiff when he was struck by a railroad train operated by defendant.

While the facts are not particularly germane to the decision of the points raised by motion for a new trial, I nevertheless recite them briefly as follows:

On May 1, 1936, plaintiff was walking on a roadway between two of defendant’s railroad tracks, the roadway *347constituting the platform of defendant’s railway station at McKeesport, Pa.

According to plaintiff’s version, he stepped into a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Holder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Patterson v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Cohen v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  4. Davies v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  5. Hodder v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API