Coonan v. Baltimore & Ohio R. R.
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas
1Opinion of the Court
Kalodner, J.,
This is a motion for a new trial, following a verdict for defendant, in a suit by plaintiff to recover damages resulting to plaintiff when he was struck by a railroad train operated by defendant.
While the facts are not particularly germane to the decision of the points raised by motion for a new trial, I nevertheless recite them briefly as follows:
On May 1, 1936, plaintiff was walking on a roadway between two of defendant’s railroad tracks, the roadway *347constituting the platform of defendant’s railway station at McKeesport, Pa.
According to plaintiff’s version, he stepped into a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Holder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Patterson v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Cohen v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
- Davies v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
- Hodder v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.