Legal Opinion

State v. Emmil

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1969No. Crim. 365PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STRUTZ, Judge.

This is a criminal action. The defendant was found guilty of aggravated reckless driving after trial to the court without a jury. He has taken this appeal from the judgment of conviction and from the order denying his motion for new trial.

We are faced at the outset with a motion by the State to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the appeal was no't timely taken. We first will consider this motion.

Our statute providing for appeals in criminal cases states, in part:

“An appeal from a verdict or judgment may he taken within three months after its rendition and from an order…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. McClellandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1943
  2. State v. FosterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905
  3. State v. PrinceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954
  4. State v. WilsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  5. State v. WileySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Blore v. John Z.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1971
  2. State v. HaakensonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973
  3. State v. EricksonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  4. State v. KroeplinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  5. State v. AnkneyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API