Legal Opinion

Turner v. Bernstein

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided August 11, 2000No. Civil Action 16190PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STRINE, Vice Chancellor.

This opinion resolves a hotly-contested motion for class certification in a case alleging that the former directors of Gen-Derm Corporation failed to disclose all the material facts necessary to permit the GenDerm stockholders to make an informed judgment whether to accept the consideration offered in a December 1997 merger with a wholly-owned subsidiary of Medicis Pharmaceutical Corporation (the “Merger”) or to seek appraisal.

I resolve the motion in favor of the plaintiffs. In so doing, I make three principal determinations.

First, I conclude that the class may be…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Ortiz v. Fibreboard Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Reuben J. Katz, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Carte Blanche CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. In re Orchard Enterprises, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2014
  2. Town of New Hartford v. Connecticut Resources Recovery AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  3. Weinman v. Fidelity Capital Appreciation Fund (In Re Integra Realty Resources, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  4. Critchfield Physical Therapy v. Taranto Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  5. In Re: El Paso Pipeline Partners, L.P. Derivative LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2014

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API