Legal Opinion

Inside Scoop, Inc. v. Curry

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 19, 1989No. Civ. A. 84-3372PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JUNE L. GREEN, District Judge.

Plaintiff seeks to collect monies due on a promissory note. Defendants Paul F. Curry and Philip M. Katz failed to answer the complaint so a default judgment was entered by the Clerk on June 12, 1985, in the amount of $189,196.00.

In its memorandum and order dated July 19, 1988, the Court granted defendant Philip Katz’ motion to vacate the default judgment. Defendant Katz, individually, is the only defendant before the Court at this time. A trial to the court followed, with both parties filing their closing arguments. For the reasons stated below, the Court…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hecht v. MalleySupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Hecht v. MalleySupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Apahouser Lock & Security Corp. v. CarvelliMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1988
  4. Dolben v. GleasonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  5. Engineering Service Corp. v. Longridge Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pt (Persero) Merpati Nusantara Airlines v. Hume & Associates PcDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API