Legal Opinion

Village of Whitefish Bay v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1967PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.

The following issues are presented in this appeal:

1. Does the WERB have exclusive jurisdiction to determine that the statutory conditions for fact-finding exist under sec. 111.70, Stats. ?

2. Does the WERB have jurisdiction to determine whether a municipal ordinance is substantially in compliance with sec. 111.70, Stats. ?

3. Is the Whitefish Bay Ordinance No. 833 in substantial compliance with sec. 111.70, Stats., with respect to:(a) Time limitations on the initiation of fact-finding?(b) voter and property owner limitations of fact-finding panel members ?(c) the requirement of a tripartite…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pabst v. Department of TaxationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Tecumseh Products Co. v. Wisconsin Employment Relations BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Kasner v. StanmireSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  4. Burmek v. Miller Brewing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  5. American Motors Corp. v. Wisconsin Employment Relations BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Harnischfeger Corp. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Racine Harley-Davidson, Inc. v. State Division of Hearings & AppealsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Beloit Education Ass'n v. Employment Relations CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  4. City of Brookfield v. Wisconsin Employment Relations CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Town of Clearfield v. CushmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API