Legal Opinion

A. E. Barker & Co. of California v. Gilinsky Fruit Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided January 19, 1939No. 11020PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WOODROUGH, Circuit Judge.

Tt appears from the record on this appeal that A. E. Barker and Company of California sold a car load of cantaloupes, then “rolling” in transit in interstate commerce, to the Gilinsky Fruit Company of *864Omaha, Nebraska, and the purchase price was not paid. Both parties were licensed under the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act of August 20, 1937, Tit. 7, Ch. 20A, U.S.C.A., p. 70, § 499d. The seller made complaint to the Secretary of Agriculture against the purchaser (Section 499f), charging unfair conduct (Section 499b) in that delivery of the shipment had been…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fleischmann Construction Co. v. United States Ex Rel. ForsbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. BowmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
  3. Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. West Virginia Pulp & Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1937

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. J. R. Simplot Company v. L. Yukon & Son Produce CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API