Legal Opinion

Rodney Nesmith v. Warden Terri Wallace

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided March 30, 2026No. 8:26-cv-00183Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA Rodney Nesmith, C/A No. 8:26-cv-183-SAL Petitioner, v. ORDER Warden Terri Wallace, Respondent. Petitioner Rodney Nesmith (“Petitioner”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, challenging the validity of his conviction and sentence. [ECF No. 1.] This matter is before the court on the Report and Recommendation (the “Report”) of Magistrate Judge William S. Brown, made in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Civil Rule 73.02(B)(2) (D.S.C.). The magistrate judge recommends…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Rovilma Diamond v. Colonial Life & Accident Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API