Legal Opinion · Dissent

Thomas v. Depaoli

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 25, 1989No. 16035Published

1DissentGreene, Judge

I respectfully dissent.

The portion of the trial court’s judgment pertinent to this appeal is contained in paragraph 11 of the trial court’s findings where this language appears:

The tight and high privacy fence (approximately six feet high and solid construction) is in violation of Restrictive Covenant No. 3 as to the front set back line or front yard set back. As it is now constructed, the fence constitutes a building within the language of ‘no dwelling, including porches or terraces or any other building’ as stated in Restrictive Covenant No. 3.

Restrictive covenant No. 3 does not mention…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lake Wauwanoka, Inc. v. SpainMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Vinyard v. St. Louis CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
  3. Dierberg v. WillsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Caniglia v. Nigro Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API