Thomas v. Depaoli
Missouri Court of Appeals
1DissentGreene, Judge
I respectfully dissent.
The portion of the trial court’s judgment pertinent to this appeal is contained in paragraph 11 of the trial court’s findings where this language appears:
The tight and high privacy fence (approximately six feet high and solid construction) is in violation of Restrictive Covenant No. 3 as to the front set back line or front yard set back. As it is now constructed, the fence constitutes a building within the language of ‘no dwelling, including porches or terraces or any other building’ as stated in Restrictive Covenant No. 3.
Restrictive covenant No. 3 does not mention…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lake Wauwanoka, Inc. v. SpainMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
- Vinyard v. St. Louis CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
- Dierberg v. WillsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- Caniglia v. Nigro Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1969