Legal Opinion

Savannah Machine & Shipyard Co. v. Director

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 17, 1981No. 79-4035PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Frank Floyd, an employ of petitioner Savannah Machine & Shipyard Company, was injured in the course of his employment. Mr. Floyd submitted a claim for compensation under the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C. §§ 901-950 (1976), (Act) and the Shipyard1 commenced paying benefits. The Shipyard subsequently asked for a hearing on the issues of whether and to what extent Floyd was disabled by his injury. In the meantime the Shipyard continued to pay compensation to Mr. Floyd.

Following a hearing at which the Shipyard took the position that Mr. Floyd’s “purported injury…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lawson v. Suwannee Fruit & Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Raymond D. Louviere v. Shell Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  3. Dillingham Corp. v. MasseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  4. Army & Air Force Exchange Service v. GreenwoodCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Savannah Machine & Shipyard Company v. Director, Office Of Workers' Compensation ProgramsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API