Harrow v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SCIRICA, Circuit Judge.
Debra Harrow, administratrix of her husband Stanley Harrow’s estate, appeals an order granting summary judgment to Prudential Insurance Company on her claim that Stanley Harrow and a putative class of plaintiffs were wrongfully denied insurance coverage for Viagra, in violation of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(B) and 29 U.S.C. § 1104(a). The District Court granted Prudential’s motion for summary judgment, finding plaintiff failed to exhaust administrative remedies before instituting suit. Harrow…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States Parole Commission v. GeraghtySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Harrow v. Prudential Insurance Company Of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002