Legal Opinion

Harrow v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 30, 2002No. 00-5049UnknownCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

SCIRICA, Circuit Judge.

Debra Harrow, administratrix of her husband Stanley Harrow’s estate, appeals an order granting summary judgment to Prudential Insurance Company on her claim that Stanley Harrow and a putative class of plaintiffs were wrongfully denied insurance coverage for Viagra, in violation of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(B) and 29 U.S.C. § 1104(a). The District Court granted Prudential’s motion for summary judgment, finding plaintiff failed to exhaust administrative remedies before instituting suit. Harrow…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. United States Parole Commission v. GeraghtySupreme Court of the United States · 1980

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Harrow v. Prudential Insurance Company Of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API