Legal Opinion

In re M. D.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 1, 2007No. A06A1686PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Presiding Judge.

The mother and father of one-year-old M. D. appeal from a juvenile court order finding M. D. to be deprived. They contend that *806the evidence was insufficient to support the juvenile court’s findings. We disagree and affirm.

In considering an appeal from the juvenile court’s finding of deprivation, we review the evidence in the light most favorable to the juvenile court’s judgment to determine whether any rational trier of fact could have found by clear and convincing evidence that the child was deprived. In the Interest of J. C., 264Ga.App. 598 (591 SE2d 475) (2003). “In…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In the Interest of D. L. W.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  2. In the Interest of J. C.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  3. In the Interest of K. J.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2004

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In the Interest of V. D.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  2. In Re MdCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  3. In the Interest of D. H. D.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API