Legal Opinion

People v. McDonald

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1870No. 2,493PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of the City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtRhodes, C. J.

On cross-examination of the defendant, who was sworn as a witness in his own behalf, the District Attorney asked the following question : “Were you not convicted and sentenced to the County Jail, for an assault on a girl about ten years of *698age?” to which question the defendant’s counsel objected, on the ground that the testimony of the witness was not the best evidence of the conviction. The objection was overruled. The Court erred in overruling the objection. (People v. Reinhart, 39 Cal. 449.)

Judgment reversed, and cause remanded for a new trial.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. ReinhartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. SearsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. People v. ElsterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  3. State v. KeithNevada Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Lewis v. Territory of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1900
  5. People v. SnellieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871