State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Hefley
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Per curiam
Respondent was charged by complainant in six counts of acts constituting professional misconduct, of acts in conflict with his oath as attorney at law, and of acts in direct violation of Canons 11 and 47 of the Canons of Professional Ethics as adopted by this Court.
■ A hearing was regularly conducted by the trial examiner on the 19th day of October, 1966, at which respondent was present and represented by his attorneys. The trial examiner thereafter submitted his report and recommendations to the Executive Council, which in turn after consideration has filed with this Court its Report,…
2Cited by1 opinion
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. PateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967