Legal Opinion
Joyner v. State
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided May 16, 1991No. 1181, September Term, 1990PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALPERT, Judge.
On April 28, 1989, police officers arrested Keith Watson and Leonard Joyner (appellants), at Joyner’s residence, for drug law violations. Appellants subsequently were charged with possession of cocaine with intent to distribute. On June 7, 1990, the Circuit Court for Baltimore City held a hearing on appellants’ motions to suppress the evidence. The court denied the motions.
Appellants entered a plea of not guilty at the court trial (the Hon. John C. Themelis, presiding) on June 11, 1990. At the conclusion of the trial, the court found appellants guilty as charged. The court…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Rawlings v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. SantanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Simpson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- Alston v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- Moulden v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2013
- Mobley v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Alston v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.