Legal Opinion

Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp. v. Reuter

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 10, 1962PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLewis W. Olliffe, J.

Alleging that no arbitrable dispute exists between the parties, Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation (MVAXC) moves to stay arbitration. Petitioner asserts that respondent, an insured under bis own automobile liability policy, has failed to show compliance with two necessary policy conditions required in a claim based upon an asserted hit-and-run accident: (1) that the accident arose out of physical contact with the hit-and-run vehicle and (2) that 44 the insured * * * shall have reported the accident” (policy endorsement, par. II [o]), MVAXC urges that the quoted clause required…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Arbitration between Grogin & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API