Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bunkley v. Florida

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 27, 2003No. 02-8636Published

1Dissent

Chief Justice Rehnquist, with whom Justice Kennedy and Justice Thomas join,

dissenting.

The Court here makes new law, and does so without briefing or argument. In Fiore v. White, 528 U. S. 23, 29 (1999), we granted certiorari to answer whether due process requires a state court to apply a judicially announced change in state criminal law retroactively. We realized after granting certiorari, however, that we could not answer that question until we knew whether there had been a change in the law at all. We therefore certified a question to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court asking whether its…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fiore v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. L.B. v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
  3. Fiore v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Commonwealth v. ScarponeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Bunkley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API