Legal Opinion
Thomas v. Potter
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 13, 1933No. 24001PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
'PER CURIAM.
A petition in error and transcript were filed in this court on August 27, 3.932.
It' is urged by the movant herein on a motion to dismiss the appeal that there is no proper transcript of the record presented to this court.
This court has uniformly held that where an appeal is by transcript, the certificate of the clerk must show affirmatively that such transcript is full, true, and correct. Wade v. Mitchell, 14 Okla. 168, 79 P. 95; Manley v. Halsell, 43 Okla. 402, 143 P. 193; McGuire v. Rash, S9 Okla. 132, 241 P. 698; Ward v. Weathers, 140 Okla. 25, 282 P. 147..In Wade v. Mitchell,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wade v. MitchellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
- Manley v. HalsellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Ward v. WeathersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
3Cited by5 opinions
- Leonard v. Tulsa Bldg. & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Short v. HaleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- Hudson v. GilbertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Local Union Textile Workers No. 1840 v. Commander Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Henderson v. Atlas Supply Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938