Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State v. Maugaotega

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 2007No. 26657Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Concurring and Dissenting Opinion by

ACOBA, J.,

with whom DUFFY, J., Joins.

I concur in the vacation of the sentences and judgments entered by the Circuit Court of the First Circuit (the court) on May 17, 2004 and May 18, 2004 against Defendants Appellant Miti Maugaotega, Jr. (Appellant). My concurrence is based upon (1) the February 20, 2007 mandate of the United States Supreme Court, Maugaotega v. Hawaii, — U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 1210, 167 L.Ed.2d 37 (2007) [hereinafter Maugaotega v. Hawaii ], (in response to the October 27, 2005 petition for writ of certiorari filed with the Court by Appellant)…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Cunningham v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API