Legal Opinion · Dissent

Rollison v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 11, 1984No. 83-545Published

1DissentHurley, Judge

The trial court ruled that the defendant lacked standing to contest the search of a trailer in which he had resided, on a periodic basis, for over two months. This ruling, in my view, was clearly erroneous. See DeLaPaz v. State, 453 So.2d 445 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984); Walker v. State, 433 So.2d 644 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Shade v. State, 400 So.2d 850 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); Brady v. State, 394 So.2d 1073 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981). The search uncovered a rifle, bank bags and money; all of which were introduced at trial. Given the relationship between the crime (armed robbery) and the goods recovered, I am not…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Shade v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  3. Walker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  4. Brady v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  5. DeLaPaz v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API