Legal Opinion

Cline v. Berger

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 29, 1939No. Civ. No. 12299PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

From an order denying defendants’ motion to dissolve a writ of attachment upon the ground that the note upon which plaintiff’s cause of action was based was secured by a chattel mortgage and a lien upon personal property, defendants appeal.

The essential facts are:

Defendants executed a promissory note in favor of plaintiff reading as follows:

*354“PROMISSORY NOTE

(Non-Negotiable)

“$8750.00 Los Angeles, California,
“September 13, 1938
“In installments as herein stated, for value received, we promise to pay to Chas. D. Cline, at Bank of America, 7th and Figueroa Branch, Los Angeles, California, the sum…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Seaboard Fin. Co. v. Fed. Leasing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API