Legal Opinion

Jameson v. O'Neall

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 3, 1912PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Palo Pinto County; W. J. Oxford, Judge. Action by J. R. Jameson against W. E. O’Neall, W. H. Boykin, and others. From a judgment for defendant Boykin, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtConner, C. J.

So far as necessary to state, this is an appeal from a judgment in favor of appellee W. H. Boykin for lot 15, block E, of the French addition to the city of Mineral Wells. Appellant instituted the suit in the usual form of trespass to try title, to which the defendant Boykin pleaded not guilty.

It is admitted that Lucinda Clark was the common source of title. Appellant, Jameson, through mesne conveyances, claims under a deed from Lucinda Clatk, duly executed February 14, 1906, and has all the title that she then could convey. Appellee' Boykin claims through the mesne conveyances under a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Treadway v. EastburnTexas Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Gibbs v. ScalesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
  3. Borden v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
  4. Stroud v. CaseyTexas Supreme Court · 1860
  5. Earnest v. GlaserCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1903

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Arcola Sugar Mills Co. v. DohertyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  2. Landa Cotton Oil Co. v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  3. Mariposa Mining Co. v. WatersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  4. Moreland v. QuanteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  5. Farquharson v. Fresno Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API