Legal Opinion

Allen v. Bolling (INMATE 3)

District Court, M.D. Alabama

Decided October 20, 2021No. 3:18-cv-00635Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTERN DIVISION ROBERT D. ALLEN, #252342, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) CIVIL ACT. NO. 3:18-cv-635-ECM ) (WO) LEON BOLLING, et al., ) ) Respondents. ) ORDER Before the court are Petitioner Robert D. Allen’s motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis (doc. 49) which the Court construes as containing a motion for a certificate of appealability. The motions are due to be denied. A certificate of appealability is necessary before a petitioner may pursue an appeal in a habeas corpus proceeding. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c). To mandate…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Barefoot v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United States v. Roy Bottoson A/K/A Linroy BottosonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  4. Robert L. Rudolph v. Walter L. AllenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API