Legal Opinion
Parke v. Spurlin
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Decided February 26, 1954PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOREMEN, Judge.
This appeal is from a judgment under which appellants, with the exception of Clinton Parke, were required specifically to perform a contract and to convey to appel-lee, G. R. Spurlin, their undivided interests in a parcel of real estate.
Appellants, Pressure (or Prussia) Parke, Mary Parke Baker, Laura Parke, Clinton Parke and Curtis Parke, obtained by inheritance undivided interests in a 44 acre farm situate in Madison County.
Curtis Parke, purportedly acting as agent for the other heirs, entered into a contract with A. T. Rose and Roy Rowland, who operated under the firm name of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Garth v. Davis & JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1905
- Montgomery v. GravesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1945
- Monroe v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
- Martin v. MathisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
- Melheiser v. Central Trust Co. of OwensboroCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Nicholson v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1990
- Chaney v. NolandCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1964
- Coles v. JohnsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1964
- Gateway Auto Auction, Inc. v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1966
- Burke v. GloverCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.