Legal Opinion
E. Frank Griswold, III v. County of Hillsborough
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided March 11, 2010No. 09-12421PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BLACK, Circuit Judge:
Appellant E. Frank Griswold is the president and sole shareholder of two businesses, Med Evac, Inc. and Med Evac, LLC (the Companies), that provide emergency medical transportation services. Griswold, a disabled veteran, argues that Appellees violated his rights under the Veterans Benefits Act of 2003, Pub.L. No. 108-183, § 36, 117 Stat. 2651, 2662 (codified at 15 U.S.C. § 657f (2003)) (the Veterans Act), by interfering with the Companies’ ability to obtain certain government contracts. The district court found that Griswold’s claims are barred under the doctrine of res…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Taylor v. SturgellSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Heiser v. WoodruffSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Ragsdale v. Rubbermaid, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Carey Dale Grayson v. Warden, Commissioner, Alabama DOCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
- Freddy Locarno Baloco v. Drummond Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
- Genworth Life and Annuity Insurance Company v. TVPX ARS, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
- Davidson v. AMR Corp. (In re AMR Corp.)District Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Alan Rodemaker v. City of Valdosta Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2024
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.