Legal Opinion

Seitz v. Board of Education

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 10, 1954PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment and order of Niagara County Court and judgments of the North Tonawanda City Court reversed on the law and facts and a new trial granted in the North Tonawanda City Court, with costs to abide the event. Memorandum: The court charged the jury that this infant was not an invitee. No exception was taken. Thus the charge became the law of the case and it was the jury’s duty to follow the instruction, whether it was correct or not. Whether the infant was an invitee while upon the abutment was a question of fact to be determined by the jury upon proper instructions. The measure of the duty…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stevens v. Central School District No. 1Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
  2. Streickler v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API