Legal Opinion

United States v. James Mitchell Clingan

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 19, 2001No. 99-6689PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STEEH, District Judge.

Defendant appeals the district court’s decision that he was not entitled to a reduction in his base offense level pursuant to United States Sentencing Guidelines (U.S.S.G.) § 2K2.1(b)(2), which allows a defendant’s base offense level to be reduced to level six if the defendant “possessed all ammunition and firearms solely for lawful sporting purposes or collection.” Because the defendant regularly bartered cars for guns and later sold the guns for profit, we AFFIRM the finding of the district court that defendant did not possess the guns solely for collection.

On…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Billy L. TalleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  2. United States v. Herman Eugene Garner, IIICourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  3. United States v. Lawrence WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  4. United States v. Howard Jay KaplanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
  2. United States v. Donald CaldwellCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
  3. United States v. Timothy R. HopkinsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  4. United States v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  5. United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API