Legal Opinion

York v. Stiefel

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 23, 1982No. 81-89PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs, James and Janis York, and Lawrence and Donna LaCroix, brought an action at law against the defendant, John C. Stiefel, an attorney, to recover damages allegedly arising from the legal malpractice of the defendant. A circuit court jury of Peoria County returned verdicts in favor of Donna LaCroix ($15,000), James York ($5,000), and Janis York ($5,000), but was unable to reach a verdict as to plaintiff Lawrence LaCroix. The trial court entered judgment on the three verdicts and declared a mistrial as to the remaining plaintiff, who ultimately moved for a voluntary dismissal of his…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Walski v. TiesengaIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Dolce v. GamberdinoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  3. House v. MaddoxAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  4. Central Illinois Light Co. v. StenzelAppellate Court of Illinois · 1963
  5. Schmidt v. Hinshaw, Culbertson, Moelmann, Hoban and FullerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Advincula v. United Blood ServicesIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Goldstein v. LustigAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  3. Martinson Bros. v. HjellumNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Simon v. WilsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  5. York v. StiefelIllinois Supreme Court · 1983

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API