Legal Opinion

The Florida Bar v. Seldin

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 12, 1988No. 69956PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

526 So.2d 41 (1988)

THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant/Cross-Respondent,

v.

Keith A. SELDIN, Respondent/Cross-Petitioner.

No. 69956.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 12, 1988.

Rehearing Denied June 30, 1988.

John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director and John T. Berry, Staff Counsel, Tallahassee, and David M. Barnovitz, Asst. Staff Counsel, Fort Lauderdale, for complainant/cross-respondent.

Barry Richard and William L. Hyde of Roberts, Baggett, LaFace & Richard, Tallahassee, and William Isenberg, Fort Lauderdale, for respondent/cross-petitioner.

2Per curiam

This disciplinary proceeding is before us on a complaint of the…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. BreedSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
  2. The Florida Bar v. NeelySupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  3. The Florida Bar v. MarksSupreme Court of Florida · 1986

4Cited by17 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
  2. The Florida Bar v. GrahamSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  3. The Florida Bar v. McShirleySupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  4. The Florida Bar v. NedickSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  5. The Florida Bar v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API